The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) estimates that this year the number of deaths from cancer related causes will be over 560,000, with heart disease leading at just over 616,000. These two causes of death together surpass the next 8 causes (stroke, respiratory disease, accidents, Alzheimer’s, diabetes, influenza and pneumonia, kidney disease and sepsis) combined. So by far, cancer and cardiac disease are our leading killers. [1]
Recently, the medical, nutrition and research literature has seen an influx of new information regarding the role of various factors in the development of cancer and other major illnesses. Of particular interest has been the role of vitamin D in disease prevention and causation.
Vitamin D is one of the fat-soluble vitamins (like vitamin E). In nature it is found in only a few food items. Most commonly one sees it as a food additive or as a dietary supplement. Vitamin D is produced naturally when sunlight (ultraviolet rays) strike the skin. These UV rays trigger vitamin D synthesis in the skin. Regardless of how it is obtained, from sun exposure, food, or supplements vitamin D is biologically inactive. In order to be of use, it must be activated via chemical reactions in our bodies. The first reaction occurs in the liver and converts vitamin D to 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], also known as calcidiol. The second reactions occurs primarily in the kidney and forms the active 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D], also known as calcitriol. [2]
The major role played by vitamin D is maintenance of normal blood levels of calcium and phosphorus. Vitamin D aids in calcium absorption from our stomach via digestion, which helps form and maintain strong bones. New research points to a role for vitamin D in prevention of osteoporosis, hypertension (high blood pressure), cancer, and several autoimmune diseases. [3, 4]
Dr. John Cannell, Executive Director of the Vitamin D Council has commented that “humans make thousands of units of vitamin D within minutes of whole body exposure to sunlight; from what we know of nature, it is unlikely such a system evolved by chance.” Dr. Frank Lipman, an internationally recognized expert in the fields of Integrative and Functional Medicine and practicing physician has commented that, “for hundreds of thousands of years, man has lived with the sun: our ancestors were outdoors far more often than indoors and we developed a dependence on sunshine for health and life, so the idea that sunlight is dangerous does not make sense. How could we have evolved and survived as a species, if we were that vulnerable to something humans have been constantly exposed to for their entire existence?” Dr. Frank Apperly, in whose concluding remark of his 1941 study on cancer rates vs. latitude stated: “A closer study of the action of solar radiation on the body might well reveal the nature of cancer immunity.”[5]
Ramagopalan and associates recently reported in Genome Research on their findings that vitamin D is involved in actions on some 229 genes with almost 2800 genomic positions affected on those genes. The summary of their abstract findings states: “Initially thought to play a restricted role in calcium homeostasis, the pleiotropic actions of vitamin D in biology and their clinical significance are only now becoming apparent. However, the mode of action of vitamin D, through its cognate nuclear vitamin D receptor (VDR), and its contribution to diverse disorders, remain poorly understood. We determined VDR binding throughout the human genome using chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by massively parallel DNA sequencing (ChIP-seq). After calcitriol stimulation, we identified 2776 genomic positions occupied by the VDR and 229 genes with significant changes in expression in response to vitamin D. VDR binding sites were significantly enriched near autoimmune and cancer associated genes identified from genome-wide association (GWA) studies. Notable genes with VDR binding included IRF8, associated with MS, and PTPN2 associated with Crohn’s disease and T1D.” [11] Reports on this study have popped up in multiple media sources as well [6,7,8,9,10]
It is true that sunlight can cause basal cell and squamous cell cancers in susceptible persons. However, a good correlation between sunlight exposure and lowered incidence of internal cancers exists. It has been shown that cancer mortality increases with distance from the equator. This finding was clearly demonstrated in a 1941 study by Dr. Frank Apperly and confirmed in other studies.[17] He examined cancer deaths across North America and found that more northern latitudes had higher cancer death rates. In his review he found that cities between 30-40 degrees latitude had an 85% higher overall cancer death rates than cities located between 10-30 degrees latitude. Cities between 40-50 degrees latitude averaged 118% higher death rates from cancer and those between 50-60 degrees latitude had a 150% higher cancer mortality. Dr. Apperly also studied the relationship of sunlight and skin cancer. Surprisingly, he found that sunlight produces an immunity to cancer in general. In locales with a mean temperature less than 42 degrees F this was even true with skin cancer. At mean temperatures higher than 42 degrees F solar radiation appears to increase the incidence of skin cancer. Upon reviewing the data, he postulated that the closer one is to the equator, the lesser the risk of developing internal cancers, but the higher the risk of developing. It appears that Dr. Apperly was among the first to investigate the relationship between temperature and skin cancer as well as how sunlight might reduce the risk of death from internal cancers. He concluded his review by saying that “a closer study of the action of solar radiation on the body might well reveal the nature of cancer immunity.” [5,6,12,19]
Cancer has in some regions of the country, surpassed heart disease as the leading cause of death. The mortality rate for cancer is high (roughly 42%) and increases with increasing age. This is particularly true for those aged 40 to 60 years. Despite discussion of cancer prevention, true efforts in this regard have been minimal. Drugs developed so far have been expensive and many have serious side effects. Most focus has been on early detection rather than prevention of cancer. There are some 18 vitamin D-sensitive cancers. Ultraviolet light, and specifically ultraviolet B (UVB), could possibly reduce cancer by limited exposure of suitable skin areas to UVB of an intensity and duration insufficient to produce skin cancer. To date, the medical literature sites a great fear of development of skin cancer from overexposure to sunlight and UV rays. To be sure, this is based on some degree of truth. Though skin cancer incidence is significant, mortality from skin cancer is rare. Roughly 1,000,000 Americans will be affected by skin cancer but only 10,000 deaths were expected in 2005 (a 1% mortality rate). Skin cancer is easily detected and often cured by excisional biopsy alone. [6,12,13,14]
All of this points to the real issue which is the role of vitamin D in prevention of cancer and disease. [2,3,4,6,7,8,9,10,11]
Some have postulated that vitamin D deficiency is a major factor in the development and progression of autism. While still a theory, the idea of a significant role for vitamin D in the causation of autism is gaining momentum. More and more scientists are examining this possible link in the hopes that this theory will hold up against scientific scrutiny. If true, it would be mean a relatively simple solution might exist for what has become a too frequent and often tragic condition. [15]
Determining vitamin D deficiency requires testing since there is no way to know for certain until a 25-hydroxyvitamin D test, also called a 25(OH)D, level is determined. It is felt that levels should be above 50 ng/ml (125 nmol/L) year-round, in both children and adults. Recent studies suggest that the minimal acceptable level is 50 ng/ml (125 nmol/L). A recent study analyzed five studies in which both the parent compound (cholecalciferol) and 25(OH)D levels were measured. Findings show that the body does not reliably begin storing cholecalciferol in fat and muscle tissue until 25(OH)D levels get above 50 ng/ml (125 nmol/L). The average person starts storing cholecalciferol at 40 ng/ml (100 nmol/L), but at 50 ng/ml (125 nmol/L) virtually everyone begins to store it for future use. Therefore, at levels below 50 ng/ml (125 nmol/L), the body uses up vitamin D as fast as you can make it, or take it, indicating chronic “starvation” in regard to vitamin D which is clearly not a good thing. 25(OH)D levels should be between 50–80 ng/ml (125–200 nmol/L), year-round. [3,12,13,14,15,16]
There is some variation in the recommended dose of vitamin D on a daily basis. Recommendations from the National Institutes of Health are far lower than those advocated by many disease prevention groups. To be sure, one must account for the amount of vitamin D estimated to be obtained from one’s diet as well as exposure to sunlight overall. Then, additional supplementation may be needed. This is especially true if one has proven low levels on blood chemistry. [3,14]
The risk of vitamin D overdose, or toxicity, seems to be minimal and to date, very rare. It is estimated that one would have to have an intake of between 600,000 and 1,680,000 IUs (International Units) per day for several days or months to develop this condition. Most over the counter supplements come in dosages of 1000, 2000 or 5000 IU. Given this fact, reasonable supplementation, especially in light of confirmed deficiency makes perfect medical sense. [3,14,18]
Patients should consult their physician and may wish to suggest that 25(OH)D levels be measured on a routine basis in conjunction with their annual physical exam and laboratory testing . . . ben kazie md
- Deaths and Mortality – http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/deaths.htm
- Vitamin D – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitamin_D
- Dietary Supplement Fact Sheet: Vitamin D – http://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/vitamind.asp
- Vitamin D – http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/vitamin-d/NS_patient-vitamind
- Vitamin D Quotes – http://www.vitamindcouncil.org/vitamin-d-quotes.shtml
- Shedding Light on Vitamin D & Cancer – http://issuu.com/iwishart/docs/investigate_apr09_100dpi
- Vitamin D linked to autoimmune and cancer disease genes, underscoring risks of deficiency – http://www.bionity.com/news/e/121670/?WT.mc_id=ca0068
- Vitamin D linked to autoimmune and cancer disease genes, underscoring risks of deficiency – http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-08/cshl-vdl081710.php
- Vitamin D Found to Influence Over 200 Genes, Highlighting Links to Disease – http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/08/100823172327.htm
- Vitamin D found to influence over 200 genes, highlighting links to disease – http://www.physorg.com/news201791554.html
- A ChIP-seq defined genome-wide map of vitamin D receptor binding: Associations with disease and evolution – (Ramagopalan SV, Heger A, Berlanga AJ, Maugeri NJ, Lincoln MR, Burrell A, Handunnetthi L, Handel AE, Disanto G, Orton S, Watson CT, Morahan JM, Giovannoni G, Ponting CP, Ebers GC, Knight JC.; Genome Res 2010 – http://genome.cshlp.org/content/early/2010/08/20/gr.107920.110.abstract?sid=7cd67983-f82c-469f-88df-d7a2e99a5fdf
- Vitamin D and Your Health Deficiency – http://www.vitamindcouncil.org/health/deficiency/am-i-vitamin-d-deficient.shtml?gclid=CPWii7P61KMCFZNg2godBH87ug
- Vitamin D Deficiency Syndrome – http://www.vitamindcouncil.org/vdds.shtml
- Treating Disease With Vitamin D – http://www.vitamindcouncil.org/treatment.shtml
- Vitamin D Theory of Autism – http://www.vitamindcouncil.org/health/autism/vit-D-theory-autism.shtml
- Am I Vitamin D Deficient? – http://www.vitamindcouncil.org/health/deficiency/am-i-vitamin-d-deficient.shtml
- An adjunctive preventive treatment for cancer: Ultraviolet light and ginkgo biloba, together with other antioxidants, are a safe and powerful, but largely ignored, treatment option for the prevention of cancer – http://www.medical-hypotheses.com/article/S0306-9877%2806%2900005-3/abstract
- Hypervitaminosis D – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypervitaminosis_D
- Apperly FL; The relation of solar radiation to cancer mortality in North America. Cancer Research. 1941:1:191-195 – http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/1/3.toc
www.blogsurfer.us www.alltheweb.com www.altavista.com www.aol.com www.associatedcontent.com www.bebo.com www.bing.com www.bloglines.com www.blogburst.com www.blogcatalog.com www.clusty.com www.digg.com www.excite.com www.google.com/buzz www.highbeam.com www.huffingtonpost.com www.lycos.com www.mashable.com www.netscape.aol.com www.newser.com www.propeller.com www.reddit.com www.topsy.com www.webcrawler.com www.wellsphere.com www.wikio.com www.wikipedia.org www.WorldTopNews.Info www.yahoo.com